Difference between revisions of "Quantum Control"

From KAIST Quantum Computing Lab Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
<center>''Fig.1: schematic diagram of the experimental setup''</center>
 
<center>''Fig.1: schematic diagram of the experimental setup''</center>
 +
#[[Image:Setup_dazzler.jpg|thumb|''Fig.1: schematic diagram of the experimental setup''|center|200px]]
 +
  
 
In weak field reigme, a transform-limited pulse is a optimal pulse to enhance a TPA. But it is not a optimal solution in strong field. The dynamic Stark shift disturbs a TPA process.  
 
In weak field reigme, a transform-limited pulse is a optimal pulse to enhance a TPA. But it is not a optimal solution in strong field. The dynamic Stark shift disturbs a TPA process.  

Revision as of 04:19, 7 October 2009

Two photon absorption in strong field

Quantum control.jpg

A shaped ultrafast pulse makes it possible to stir a quantum system and thus control a quantum process via light-matter interaction. Two photon absorption(TPA) process in two-level atoms is one of the good testbed for coherent control. We study coherent control schemes for a TPA process in a strong field. For a optimal coherent scheme to enhance TPA, strong field effects(dynamic Stark shift) have been considered.

Setup dazzler.jpg
Fig.1: schematic diagram of the experimental setup
  1. Fig.1: schematic diagram of the experimental setup


In weak field reigme, a transform-limited pulse is a optimal pulse to enhance a TPA. But it is not a optimal solution in strong field. The dynamic Stark shift disturbs a TPA process.

Intensity total v4.jpg
Fig.2: fluoresence as a function of chirp rates and transform-limited intensity of pulses

A linear chirped pulse is more optimal than a transform-limited pulse.


Detuning total v6.jpg
Fig.3: fluorescence as a function of detuning and chirp rates